+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 mini vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 mini leads with 9.9% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 mini supports multimodal inputs. GPT-4.1 mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4.1, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve applications where speed and cost are priorities while maintaining solid performance, it extends the GPT-4.1 capabilities to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 32B was created as a larger variant in the Qwen 2.5 family, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities with 32 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring stronger reasoning and generation quality, it represents a powerful option for demanding language understanding tasks.
6 months newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Average Score:76.3%(+9.9%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:66.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 mini
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
2 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 5ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Avg Score:76.3%(+9.9%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:66.4%
Providers:0