Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 17.0% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 mini offers 949.3K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Both models have similar pricing. GPT-4.1 mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4.1, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve applications where speed and cost are priorities while maintaining solid performance, it extends the GPT-4.1 capabilities to resource-conscious deployments.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
4 months newer

GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
2025-04-14

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

GPT-4.1 mini

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks

GPT-4.1 mini

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
GPT-4.1 mini
2024-05-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
ZeroEval


GPT-4.1 mini

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

GPT-4.1 mini

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita