+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 nano vs Jamba 1.5 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 nano leads with 14.2% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano offers 568.1K more tokens in context window than Jamba 1.5 Mini. Both models have similar pricing. GPT-4.1 nano supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4.1 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini was created as a more compact hybrid model, designed to bring the benefits of Jamba's architecture to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide long-context capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables efficient processing of extended inputs in practical applications.
7 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Mini
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($0.10 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:65.2%(+14.2%)
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Average Score:51.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2024-03-05
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 200 tok/s
Latency: 2ms
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:65.2%(+14.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Avg Score:51.0%
Providers:2