+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 nano vs Kimi-k1.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi-k1.5 leads with 20.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Kimi-k1.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K1.5 was developed by Moonshot AI as an advanced language model with extended context capabilities, designed to handle long documents and conversations. Built to excel at tasks requiring comprehension of extensive information, it represents Moonshot's approach to long-context language understanding.
2 months newer
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:59.1%
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:79.4%(+20.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 200 tok/s
Latency: 2ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:59.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:79.4%(+20.3%)
Providers:0