+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 nano vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 26.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano offers 556.1K more tokens in context window than Kimi K2 0905. GPT-4.1 nano is $2.60 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4.1 nano supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
4 months newer
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($2.60 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:53.3%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:79.3%(+26.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 200 tok/s
Latency: 2ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:53.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:79.3%(+26.1%)
Providers:2