+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 nano vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads with 27.0% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning Plus was created as an enhanced reasoning variant, designed to provide even deeper analytical capabilities within the Phi-4 family. Built to maximize reasoning quality while maintaining the efficiency benefits of small models, it represents the most capable reasoning-focused option in the Phi-4 series.
16 days newer
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:51.4%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Average Score:78.4%(+27.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 200 tok/s
Latency: 2ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:51.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Avg Score:78.4%(+27.0%)
Providers:0