Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 nano leads with 5.0% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano offers 824.3K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. GPT-4.1 nano supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, GPT-4.1 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
6 months newer

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19

GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Cost per million tokens (USD)

GPT-4.1 nano

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

GPT-4.1 nano

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

GPT-4.1 nano

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

GPT-4.1 nano

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Lambda