+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 leads with 23.4% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 offers 824.3K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $9.97 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 represents an iterative improvement in the GPT-4 series, developed to refine the foundational capabilities established by GPT-4. Built to incorporate learnings and optimizations from the deployment of previous versions, it continues the evolution of OpenAI's flagship model line with enhanced reliability and performance.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
6 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($9.97 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Average Score:81.3%(+23.4%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:57.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 10ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Avg Score:81.3%(+23.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:57.9%
Providers:1