+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 leads with 22.2% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 offers 824.3K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $9.70 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 represents an iterative improvement in the GPT-4 series, developed to refine the foundational capabilities established by GPT-4. Built to incorporate learnings and optimizations from the deployment of previous versions, it continues the evolution of OpenAI's flagship model line with enhanced reliability and performance.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
9 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($9.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Average Score:90.2%(+22.2%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 10ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Avg Score:90.2%(+22.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2