+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 leads with 12.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, GPT-4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 represents an iterative improvement in the GPT-4 series, developed to refine the foundational capabilities established by GPT-4. Built to incorporate learnings and optimizations from the deployment of previous versions, it continues the evolution of OpenAI's flagship model line with enhanced reliability and performance.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
1 month newer
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Average Score:77.1%(+12.3%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:64.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 10ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Avg Score:77.1%(+12.3%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:64.8%
Providers:0