+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 29.9% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 offers 824.3K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Qwen3 32B is $9.60 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 represents an iterative improvement in the GPT-4 series, developed to refine the foundational capabilities established by GPT-4. Built to incorporate learnings and optimizations from the deployment of previous versions, it continues the evolution of OpenAI's flagship model line with enhanced reliability and performance.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
15 days newer
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($9.60 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Average Score:47.3%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:77.1%(+29.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 10ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Avg Score:47.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:77.1%(+29.9%)
Providers:3