+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.5 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.5 leads with 23.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct offers 123.9K more tokens in context window than GPT-4.5. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $224.97 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.5 was developed as an intermediate advancement between GPT-4 and GPT-5, designed to incorporate incremental improvements in reasoning, factuality, and instruction-following. Built to bridge generational capabilities while maintaining compatibility with existing applications, it represents a refinement of the GPT-4 architecture with enhanced performance characteristics.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
5 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
GPT-4.5
OpenAI
2025-02-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.5
Input:$75.00
Output:$150.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($224.97 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.5
Average Score:86.4%(+23.6%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:62.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.5
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 20ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.5
Avg Score:86.4%(+23.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:62.8%
Providers:1