+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.5 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.5 leads with 22.8% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct offers 123.9K more tokens in context window than GPT-4.5. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $224.70 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.5 was developed as an intermediate advancement between GPT-4 and GPT-5, designed to incorporate incremental improvements in reasoning, factuality, and instruction-following. Built to bridge generational capabilities while maintaining compatibility with existing applications, it represents a refinement of the GPT-4 architecture with enhanced performance characteristics.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
7 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
GPT-4.5
OpenAI
2025-02-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.5
Input:$75.00
Output:$150.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($224.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.5
Average Score:90.8%(+22.8%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.5
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 20ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.5
Avg Score:90.8%(+22.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2