+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 7.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. GPT-4o is available on 2 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.4% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MGSM (90.5%), HumanEval (90.2%), MMLU (88.7%). It supports a 132K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-05-13
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:34.4%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:41.5%(+7.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 92 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:34.4%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:41.5%(+7.1%)
Providers:0