+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o mini vs Grok-3 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 43.8% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o mini offers 8.4K more tokens in context window than Grok-3 Mini. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
7 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60($0.05 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:40.2%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:84.0%(+43.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
1 providers
Azure
Throughput: 92 tok/s
Latency: 0.52ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:40.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:84.0%(+43.8%)
Providers:1