+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o mini vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 leads with 33.2% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
1 year newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:43.6%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:76.8%(+33.2%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Coding8.7%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Coding65.8%(+57.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
1 providers
Azure
Throughput: 92 tok/s
Latency: 0.52ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:43.6%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:76.8%(+33.2%)
Providers:0