+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o mini vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 10.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.9M more tokens in context window than GPT-4o mini. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
8 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60($0.02 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:65.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:76.0%(+10.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
1 providers
Azure
Throughput: 92 tok/s
Latency: 0.52ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:65.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:76.0%(+10.1%)
Providers:7