+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o mini vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 3.7% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.9M more tokens in context window than GPT-4o mini. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
8 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($0.37 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:65.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:69.6%(+3.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
1 providers
Azure
Throughput: 92 tok/s
Latency: 0.52ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:65.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:69.6%(+3.7%)
Providers:6