+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o mini vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o mini leads with 14.0% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct offers 111.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o mini. Both models have similar pricing. GPT-4o mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4o mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
Launched on the same date
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.45 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:82.0%(+14.0%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
1 providers
Azure
Throughput: 92 tok/s
Latency: 0.52ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:82.0%(+14.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2