+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o mini vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o mini leads with 11.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o mini offers 8.2K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, GPT-4o mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
2 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.45 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:71.1%(+11.1%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:60.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
1 providers
Azure
Throughput: 92 tok/s
Latency: 0.52ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:71.1%(+11.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:60.0%
Providers:1