+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o mini vs Pixtral Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Pixtral Large leads with 8.6% higher average benchmark score. Pixtral Large offers 111.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o mini. GPT-4o mini is $7.25 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Pixtral Large is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large was developed as a larger-scale multimodal model, designed to provide advanced vision-language understanding capabilities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated analysis of visual and textual information, it represents Mistral's flagship offering for multimodal applications.
4 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Pixtral Large
Mistral AI
2024-11-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60($7.25 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:58.1%
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Average Score:66.7%(+8.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
1 providers
Azure
Throughput: 92 tok/s
Latency: 0.52ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:58.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Avg Score:66.7%(+8.6%)
Providers:1