+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o mini vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 6.2% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 32B was created as a larger variant in the Qwen 2.5 family, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities with 32 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring stronger reasoning and generation quality, it represents a powerful option for demanding language understanding tasks.
2 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:69.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:76.1%(+6.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
1 providers
Azure
Throughput: 92 tok/s
Latency: 0.52ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:69.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:76.1%(+6.2%)
Providers:0