+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 21.7% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. GPT-4o is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
8 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:83.4%(+21.7%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:61.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:83.4%(+21.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:61.7%
Providers:0