+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Grok Code Fast 1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok Code Fast 1 leads with 37.6% higher average benchmark score. Grok Code Fast 1 offers 121.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Grok Code Fast 1 is $10.80 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok Code Fast 1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok Code Fast was developed as a specialized coding model optimized for speed, designed to provide rapid code completion, generation, and assistance. Built to serve developers requiring quick feedback and iterative coding support, it combines programming expertise with low-latency responses.
1 year newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Input:$0.20
Output:$1.50($10.80 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:33.2%
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Average Score:70.8%(+37.6%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Coding33.2%
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Coding70.8%(+37.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:33.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Avg Score:70.8%(+37.6%)
Providers:1