+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Jamba 1.5 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 28.7% higher average benchmark score. Jamba 1.5 Mini offers 367.9K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Jamba 1.5 Mini is $11.90 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini was created as a more compact hybrid model, designed to bring the benefits of Jamba's architecture to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide long-context capabilities with reduced computational requirements, it enables efficient processing of extended inputs in practical applications.
16 days newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Jamba 1.5 Mini
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.40($11.90 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:76.8%(+28.7%)
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Average Score:48.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Mini
2024-03-05
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:76.8%(+28.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Avg Score:48.2%
Providers:2