+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 leads with 17.8% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. GPT-4o is available on 2 providers. Overall, Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
1 year newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:50.8%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:68.6%(+17.8%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Coding33.2%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Coding65.8%(+32.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:50.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:68.6%(+17.8%)
Providers:0