+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 8.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct offers 111.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $12.10 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
14 days newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($12.10 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:77.9%(+8.1%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:69.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:77.9%(+8.1%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:69.8%
Providers:9