+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 5.5% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. GPT-4o is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B was developed by NVIDIA through customization of Meta's Llama 3.1 70B, designed to enhance performance for specific use cases and deployments. Built with NVIDIA's optimizations and fine-tuning expertise, it demonstrates how foundation models can be adapted for specialized applications.
1 month newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:85.7%(+5.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:80.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:85.7%(+5.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:80.2%
Providers:0