+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 1.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.9M more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Llama 4 Scout is $12.12 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
8 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($12.12 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:77.5%(+1.2%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:76.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:77.5%(+1.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:76.3%
Providers:6