+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Ministral 8B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 20.7% higher average benchmark score. Ministral 8B Instruct offers 111.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Ministral 8B Instruct is $12.30 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Ministral 8B was developed as a compact yet capable model from Mistral AI, designed to provide strong instruction-following with just 8 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring efficient deployment while maintaining reliable performance, it represents Mistral's smallest production-ready offering.
2 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Ministral 8B Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-10-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Ministral 8B Instruct
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.10($12.30 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:85.7%(+20.7%)
+
+
+
+
Ministral 8B Instruct
Average Score:65.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:85.7%(+20.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Ministral 8B Instruct
Avg Score:65.0%
Providers:1