+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 17.7% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct offers 111.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $12.20 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
19 days newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($12.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:85.7%(+17.7%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:85.7%(+17.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2