+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 16.7% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
17 days newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:78.4%(+16.7%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:61.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:78.4%(+16.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:61.7%
Providers:0