+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 8.9% higher average benchmark score. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct offers 111.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is $12.35 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Multimodal was created to handle multiple input modalities including text, images, and potentially other formats. Built to extend Phi-4's efficiency into multimodal applications, it demonstrates that compact models can successfully integrate diverse information types.
5 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Microsoft
2025-02-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($12.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:77.7%(+8.9%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Average Score:68.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:77.7%(+8.9%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Avg Score:68.8%
Providers:1