+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 7.2% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o offers 5.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is $11.75 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 72B was developed as the flagship text model in the Qwen 2.5 series, designed to provide advanced language capabilities with 72 billion parameters. Built to compete with frontier models in reasoning, coding, and general language tasks, it represents Qwen's most capable instruction-following model in this generation.
1 month newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40($11.75 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:75.3%(+7.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Average Score:68.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:75.3%(+7.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Avg Score:68.1%
Providers:4