+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 20.6% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o offers 5.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is $11.90 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
1 month newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.30($11.90 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:75.3%(+20.6%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:54.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:75.3%(+20.6%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:54.6%
Providers:1