+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 17.5% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct offers 111.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is $12.32 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
1 month newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($12.32 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:80.2%(+17.5%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:62.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:80.2%(+17.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:62.7%
Providers:4