+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 8.0% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
6 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:75.9%(+8.0%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:67.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:75.9%(+8.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:67.9%
Providers:0