+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 leads with 11.4% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 offers 242.7K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is $9.20 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B Thinking was developed as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the large-scale Qwen3 architecture. Built to combine deliberate analytical processing with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves tasks requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
11 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-07-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input:$0.30
Output:$3.00($9.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:52.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Average Score:64.1%(+11.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:52.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Avg Score:64.1%(+11.4%)
Providers:1