+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 10.6% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o offers 13.3K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $10.85 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
1 year newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50($10.85 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:58.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:68.6%(+10.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:58.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:68.6%(+10.6%)
Providers:1