+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-5 nano vs Grok-3 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 9.2% higher average benchmark score. GPT-5 nano offers 392.0K more tokens in context window than Grok-3 Mini. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Nano was developed as the most compact variant in the GPT-5 family, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments and edge computing scenarios. Built to bring next-generation AI capabilities to devices and applications where latency and efficiency are paramount, it distills GPT-5 innovations into a minimal footprint.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
5 months newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
GPT-5 nano
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.40($0.35 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Average Score:78.2%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:87.4%(+9.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 nano
2024-05-30
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
2 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Avg Score:78.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:87.4%(+9.2%)
Providers:1