+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-5 nano vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 nano leads with 24.5% higher average benchmark score. GPT-5 nano offers 272.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, GPT-5 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Nano was developed as the most compact variant in the GPT-5 family, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments and edge computing scenarios. Built to bring next-generation AI capabilities to devices and applications where latency and efficiency are paramount, it distills GPT-5 innovations into a minimal footprint.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
10 months newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
GPT-5 nano
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.40($0.30 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Average Score:71.2%(+24.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:46.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 nano
2024-05-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
2 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Avg Score:71.2%(+24.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:46.7%
Providers:5