+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-5 nano vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 nano offers 391.8K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Nano was developed as the most compact variant in the GPT-5 family, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments and edge computing scenarios. Built to bring next-generation AI capabilities to devices and applications where latency and efficiency are paramount, it distills GPT-5 innovations into a minimal footprint.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
10 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
GPT-5 nano
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.15 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 nano
2024-05-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
2 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1