+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-5 nano vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 nano leads with 6.0% higher average benchmark score. GPT-5 nano supports multimodal inputs. GPT-5 nano is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-5 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Nano was developed as the most compact variant in the GPT-5 family, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments and edge computing scenarios. Built to bring next-generation AI capabilities to devices and applications where latency and efficiency are paramount, it distills GPT-5 innovations into a minimal footprint.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B was developed as a reasoning-focused model, designed to emphasize analytical thinking and problem-solving capabilities. Built with 32 billion parameters optimized for step-by-step reasoning, it demonstrates Qwen's exploration into models that prioritize deliberate analytical processing.
5 months newer
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
GPT-5 nano
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Average Score:71.2%(+6.0%)
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:65.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 nano
2024-05-30
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
2 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Avg Score:71.2%(+6.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:65.2%
Providers:0