+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-5 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 leads with 24.5% higher average benchmark score. GPT-5 offers 272.0K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $10.95 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 represents the next generation of OpenAI's foundational models, developed to advance the frontier of AI capabilities in reasoning, knowledge, and general intelligence. Built to push beyond the limitations of GPT-4, it incorporates architectural and training improvements designed to enhance performance across diverse tasks and domains.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
1 year newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
GPT-5
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-5
Input:$1.25
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($10.95 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-5
Average Score:92.5%(+24.5%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5
2024-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-5
2 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 2ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-5
Avg Score:92.5%(+24.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2