+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT OSS 120B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 120B leads with 29.6% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 120B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 120B was developed as an open-source model release from OpenAI, designed to provide the research and developer community with access to a capable language model. Built with 120 billion parameters, it enables experimentation, fine-tuning, and deployment in contexts where open-source licensing and transparency are valued.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
3 months newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:90.0%(+29.6%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:60.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
5 providers
DeepInfra
Groq
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Novita
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:90.0%(+29.6%)
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:60.4%
Providers:0