+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT OSS 120B vs Grok-1.5V
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-1.5V leads with 5.1% higher average benchmark score. Grok-1.5V supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, Grok-1.5V is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-1.5V is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (88.3%), DocVQA (85.6%), TextVQA (78.1%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Grok-1.5V
xAI
2024-04-12
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:30.9%
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Average Score:35.9%(+5.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
5 providers
DeepInfra
Groq
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Novita
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:30.9%
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Avg Score:35.9%(+5.1%)
Providers:0