Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 39.7% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 120B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together