Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct leads with 16.7% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 120B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (91.1%), DocVQA (88.4%), ChartQA (83.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Sambanova
Together