Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 20.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 120B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $0.51 cheaper per million tokens. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
GPT OSS 120B
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra