+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT OSS 120B vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 120B leads with 21.8% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 120B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 120B was developed as an open-source model release from OpenAI, designed to provide the research and developer community with access to a capable language model. Built with 120 billion parameters, it enables experimentation, fine-tuning, and deployment in contexts where open-source licensing and transparency are valued.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
4 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:85.0%(+21.8%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:63.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
5 providers
DeepInfra
Groq
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Novita
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:85.0%(+21.8%)
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:63.3%
Providers:0